|
3/30/06
I bet you can relate to this. I hook up – play the fish – bring it to net
and just as I position my net – ping – the tippet breaks and my buddy
hollers “Break em off?” If you can’t relate to that or something similar
you’re a lucky fisherman because most of us have broken fish off. There are
many reasons for broken tippets. Fish do have teeth, and then there are
poor knots along with any number of other problems. Seldom is the problem
tippet strength.
What brings
me to this topic is a recent development on our forum of a fly system Jeremy
Cameron and I call the Simplefly System. It’s something Jeremy and I cooked
up for an integrated fly system that allows you to change fly style and
color without having to cut your fly off and re-tie. (you can see what I’m
talking about by following this link
http://www.fliesandfins.com/simplefly.wmv)
The heart of
this system is a bead chain connector. The type you see hanging from old
lights in the cellar or at camp. A lot of people who have looked at the new
system question the strength of the bead chain link. So do I but I’ve
tugged and pulled on enough of that bead chain in the last few day to
satisfy myself that it is at least equal to a 15 pound test tippet – so the
question has become – is 15 pounds enough?
Well, Jim
Teeny says he fishes with 12, 15 and 20 pound leaders and he’s happy with
those ratings.
Lee Wulff
often fished for big fish with light rods and light tippets. Here’s a quote
from his book “The Atlantic Salmon” about playing fish. “The tackle
includes a reel which is there to hold the line and to let a fish run. A
fish of 5 pounds can break a leader just as quickly as a fifty-pounder.
Anyone who tries to stop a fresh salmon of any size from running will break
his tackle. He has failed in the whole idea of playing a fish, which is to
give line whenever the pressure calls for it and before the tackle
breaks.”
Kinda sums it up doesn’t it?
So what
breaks tippet? Sudden changes in pressure or tension are the best I can come
up with. If you have constant pressure and a gradual increase in tension
allowing time to give line to a fish you will seldom have break-offs. Lee
Wulff cited panic as a major reason for break-offs. Spook a fish with a
failed net swipe or by stoning a pool and you get tippet-breaking spurts
from that panicked fish. If the fish doesn’t just start running instead it
BURSTS to top speed – there goes your tippet.
Slow
reactions are another cause. People often say tip-flex rods break tippets.
Well they don’t – they might accent your slow response to a fish that turns
and runs – but they get blamed for being the cause and they shouldn’t be.
If your drag is set just tight enough to prevent the over-running or
backlash of your reel a sudden run by a fish shouldn’t break your tippet.
However, if when that fish runs you are palming the reel and don’t respond
by releasing the spool – or you are a little slow about it bad things can
happen. All to often, the penalty for not dropping your rod tip or
releasing the spool is a broken tippet and blaming it on the tip-flex rod is
as good a reason as any. More often the real reason is reaction time or
drags that are set to tight.
Rod angle is
another tippet breaker. When I’m netting a fish and I have to point my rod
at some spot high in the sky and behind me to get the fish close enough to
net – I worry. There is no worse position to be in. I do all kinds of
things to avoid that situation but sometimes I just can’t. When that
happens I make sure I’m paying attention to pressure and tension and I try
to anticipate any change in the situation that might allow me to reel in
some additional line allowing me to change the angle of my rod back to a
more horizontal position.
Those three
things, sudden changes in tension, slow reactions and bad rod angles are
what break tippets. Those three things and the fact that sometimes the fish
gods just want to mess with you.
Be sure and visit the
Forum
and share your thoughts on the
topic.
Oh yea, one
more thing - this is the last Thursday Review until next December.
Starting
April 1st I'll be switching over to doing Friday Updates about the
conditions on the Kennebec River.
I'll put a link up here to my first Friday Update when I post it.
Thanks for
taking the time to stop by and read these postings. - Mike
03/23/06
Fly selection based on which insects are active in the spring was last
week’s topic. Building on that I though I’d cover some of the factors other
than “active insects” that influence my fly selection.
When I get to the water I get ready on the
water’s edge and I MAKE myself wait before I begin fishing. Why I wait is
so I can gather the clues that are right there in front of me. I look at
the water and judge its color and speed, then check the air for flying
insects and if I don’t see any flying around I check the streamside leaves
for resting insects. In short, I observe and it took me years to learn to
do this instead of just wading in and starting to cast.
If there is a hatch – I try to match it with
an imitative pattern. No hatch? I grab some suggestive patterns and search
the water. No hatch and no response to searching patterns? Out come the
attractors and I try to shock a response out of them. That’s why in last
week’s post I mentioned that if my imitative patterns failed I grab a Bead
Head Mini-Leech.
Let’s start with an easy situation – there is
a hatch. Matching the hatch can be simple. If you can capture a bug all
you have to do is select a fly that has the same general size, color and
shape. Often you’ll find those three factors are dwarfed by presentation.
The most important of these factors, for me, is Presentation followed by
Size, Color and then Shape.
In the simplest terms I explain them as:
Presentation – if the insects are drifting dead drift, low in or high on the
water so should my fly, Color – try to come close, Size – pick a size and
then go smaller and for Shape – well at its most basic level shape boils
down to fat, thin, long, stubby, straight or curved. Those factors are my
considerations when matching the hatch. Without a hatch to provide clues I
start to search.
When I play the searching game I use
suggestive patterns. Some of my favorite searching nymphs are the Gold
Ribbed Hare’s Ear, Zug Bug, Breadcrust and Prince patterns. On almost any
water if I rig up with a Prince and a Gold Ribbed Hare’s Ear I’m
automatically able to fish with confidence because I know those flies work.
With confidence gained I can concentrate on the water and seek out likely
spots for trout – prime lies.
Those with shelter from the current, shelter
from predators and a steady supply of food brought by the current.
Identifying prime lies is another confidence booster – there should be fish
there – that puts it up to me. Presentation becomes my job and I present as
carefully as I can. If I work a Prime Lie for awhile and it doesn’t produce
I move on to another likely looking spot. Still nothing? That’s when I
give up and throw imitation and suggestion aside. Out come the attractors.
Attractors, for me, are a last resort. For
many others attractors are the first things they try. It’s the old
different strokes game and both are right – at times. My objective when I
hit the water is to catch a fish and my favorite way is by tricking that
fish into thinking my fly is food. As soon as I tie on an attractor – I’ve
admitted I couldn’t do it the way I wanted to but that’s OK because I’m
still in pursuit of my original goal. I’ve just switched triggers.
Attractors trigger something other than
feeding. Curiosity, startled reaction and aggression are now my friends and
my objective. A good friend of mine Jim Thibodeau sums up the curiosity
part of it with this favorite quote “fish got no hands ya know” and he’s
right. Make a fish curious enough and they’ll take just to find our what
that thing is. I use mildly bright and flashy flies to target curious trout
– patterns like flash backs and beadheads with bright beads.
Startled reaction and aggression are also
effective triggers for strikes and for that I go bright and add motion.
Give me a Copper John, with rubber legs and I’ve got the same confidence I
talked about earlier – I’m fishing a fly I know works.
In summary that’s my routine. I hit the
water’s edge and look for clues. If the clues tell me there is or were
recent hatches I imitate. No hatches – I search prime lies with imitative
flies I know work. No hatch and no success with suggestive patterns I use
“shock and awe” and try to trigger curious or aggressive strikes.
Be sure and visit the
Forum
and share your thoughts on the
topic.
03/16/06
Tom Rosenbauer author
of “The Orvis Streamside Guide to Approach and Presentation” says “I like to
reserve nymphs for deeper
pools,
after I’ve tried a few casts with a dry, or when water temperatures are
below 50 degrees F.” What that says to me is my best bet for the next two
months, say until the middle of May is to fish a nymph. Why? Well it’ll
be May before our waters warm up to 50 degrees; at least in the big rivers
like the Kennebec.
Last year the Kennebec hit the 50-degree mark around May 20th
and within a couple of days the Hendricksons were hatching. It did us
little good as the river spiked to 70,000cfs that week. But before it hit
that temperature kicking off the early hatches and before it went spate,
nymphs were working. Which nymphs and what type of water you might ask.

Well, for water I looked for deeper slots, pools at the foot
of riffles and long fairly deep smooth glides. Then I fished my nymphs
dead-drift and right on bottom. The right on bottom part dictated my fly
selection. Deep slots, runs and pools call for weight and one of my
favorite weighted flies is a double tungsten beaded stonefly in either black
or brown. That will get me down and the fly is appropriate for that type of
water. Stones are leaving the faster water that time of year and migrating
to the shores planning on crawling out of the water and hatching. But
Stoneflies aren’t the only things moving around down there. Mayflies too.
Yep, those Hendricksons are getting ready to hatch; Blue
Quills, Quill Gordons, Blue Winged Olives and March Browns are all likely
candidates. I asked myself, why not hang one of them off the Stonefly as a
dropper? This is roughly the thought process I went through picking my
dropper.
Which to fish – which to fish? Confusing to say the least
when you throw out 5 or 6 mayflies to select from. I let the water type the
nymphs like decide for me. Most mayflies can be pegged as one of four
types: Clingers, Crawlers, Burrowers and Swimmers and each group likes
different water conditions.
The Quill Gordon and March Brown nymphs are Clingers and
they’re up in the faster water Clingers like. The trout don’t want to deal
with that kind of flow when the water is below 50-degrees, so that gets them
off the list.
Hendricksons and Blue Quills are Crawlers and could well be
part of the “bugs” found in pools at the foot of riffles or deeper slots –
good candidates for the water I plan to fish. Out of my list of five that
leaves Blues Winged Olives (Baetidae) and they are Swimmers. And bless their
little hearts they’re found in most water types, save the really fast water.
So
having shut out Quill Gordon and March Brown nymphs (the Clingers) and
narrowed the possibilities to Hendricksons, Blue Quills and Blue Winged
Olives the question remains – what do we put in tandem with our Stoneflies?
Well the only swimmer of the group is the Blue Winged Olive and a good
imitation for that is a Sawyer Pheasant Tail (16 – 20).
The other two are Crawlers (Hendrickson and Blue Quill) and
the Blue Quill nymph is imitated with a Sawyer Pheasant Tail (16 – 18) –
hey, we might be on to something here. That Sawyer Pheasant Tail is
sounding good. What about the Hendrickson?
Nope it’s not that easy The Hendrickson, of course, is a
little bigger, fatter and lighter in color. Nymph of choice for them is a
Hare’s Ear (12 – 18) but that’s not all bad. We can fish three flies
legally in Fly Fishing Only water so why not have at it.
So, there was my selection process and those are my early
flies. I rig them up with the Stonefly tied directly to my leader. From
the bend of the Stonefly I tie on 18” of tippet (4X) and to that I tie on a
size 12 Hare’s Ear. From the bend of the Hare’s Ear I tie 18” of tippet
(5X) and to that I tie on a size 18 Sawyer Pheasant tail. And, if all that
fails I just fish a Bead Head Mini Leech.

Be sure and visit the
Forum
and share your thoughts on the
topic.
03/13/06
Pretty soon I’ll be doing Friday Updates instead for Thursday Reviews so I
though I’d do a practice run this today. So here’s my late
Thursday Review in a Friday Update format.
The river is running cold (34 degrees), fast
and clear. I waded in by the beach area (Shawmut side) and to work to get
through the new wood that has been deposited in along shore. Once I gained
access to the gravel bar just beyond the pool despite the water level being
just above my knee I was worried about wading – the flow is that fast. The
gravel was washing out from beneath my wading boots just standing still. I
fished around a bit and worked my way upstream to the rip above but even the
pools after the small rips were so fast no fish would hold in that current
unless there was major hatch. So I picked my way out and was wishing I
hadn’t forgotten my wading staff. Wading staffs are good things, especially,
around sunken logs with branches that reach out and grab your wading boots.
Having
established that flow everywhere, except the deeper pools and eddies, was to
fast for fish to be holding I decided to find some deeper pools. That meant
walking downriver and downriver I went. I saw a good deal of wildlife – I
wasn’t the only one with spring fever. The beaver is alive and well I not
only saw him but I saw evidence of his work. When I saw our friend the
beaver I reached for my camera but didn’t get it out before he dove never to
reappear. It
turned out to be a good thing I had grabbed my camera because as I stood
there wishing I hadn’t missed that shot I began to hear a real racket coming
my way. Geese – lots of geese have found there way back and a gaggle of
them were headed my way and loudly announcing their arrival. They kept
coming and flew right over my head – it’s neat the hear them honking their
way home but even better to have them pass so close overhead that you can
hear the noise of their wings. Already having my camera out made it easy to
get a couple of shots.
With these pictures of things I saw on
the way you have probable guessed that I don’t
have any fish pictures – if you did you’re right. My half-mile walk
downriver didn’t bring me to any productive water. It was nice to be out, I
enjoyed myself got some fresh air, found out the bottom has changed some and
is scrubbed clean (lots of fresh clean gravel in areas that were covered
with silt last fall). But my walk did bring me to some water that was at
least fishable and fish I did.
I pounded the bottom (weed free bottom so hook-ups came loose) and got
nothing but real estate. I did hook one clump of dead weeds that gave me a
thrill as the clump broke free when I set the hook and the current rolled
the clump downriver with what felt to me like a fighting fish motion.
However, as soon as the clump rolled out of the current into the slack water
I was fishing it quickly became clear what had happened. Nice quick thrill
though.
So here’s what I gathered from yesterday’s
adventure:
Bring
your staff – there’s lots of new wood in the river.
If you’re fighting the flow and having a hard
time seeing bottom – take baby steps – it’s safer.
If you want to go out and fish dries now – go
ahead they aren’t biting on bottom either.
The early little stones have started to
hatch.
Be sure and visit the
Forum
and share your thoughts on the
topic.
03/02/06
A recent, fly-fishing magazine, article talks about “banging the banks” when
drift boat fishing. One technique suggested was drifting when spring
floodwaters were beginning to recede. The idea was to watch the water
clarity and level – when the water cleared
enough
for at least 18” of visibility and the level came out of the woods and back
into the “banks” (still high but within the banks) that was the time to
drift and pound the banks.
The focus was
on drift boat fishing and when you finished the article it made you want to
plan your next drift. But what if you don’t have a drift boat and don’t
plan on booking a drift boat trip. Well, in that case you fish from the
bank. Bank fishing with streamers has been an early season tactic in Maine
for as long as I can remember. Mainly out of necessity – no one wants to
wade the river when the visibility is only 18”and the flow is fast but they
do want to fish. After all, there is a big difference between not wanting
to wade and not wanting to fish, they just aren’t the same thing.
So my
suggesting is break out that streamer rod and go fishing. A regular spring
tactic is to watch for the conditions mentioned in the article and then
search out points, ledges, pastures or other topography that allow for a
backcast and then picking a favorite streamer and trying your luck. If you
don’t do any early season “streamer swinging” you should give it a try this
year.
After all one
steadfast rule of fishing is to fish where there are fish. In the spring
fish are on the banks, often there are big fish. The chilly spring flow is
warmer in shallows, the current is milder and usually there are baitfish
hanging our in the shallows for the same comfort reasons. The big fish just
move in and find comfort in the warmer, slower flows and at the same time
get to take advantage of the limited visibility to ambush their dinner.
You don’t
need any special gear for early season streamers. Most anglers use 7 to
9-weight
floating
or sink-tip lines, which make tossing big bulky streamers like Wool-head
Sculpins, Muddlers, Double-Bunnies or Zonkers a little easier. Rig your
favorite rod with a 6 to 9-foot, 2 or 3X leader, tie a good knot and start
by casting short – as
in
start with only about
10-feet
of fly line beyond the rod tip. Flip that out in front of you – let it
swing while bouncing your rod tip – and when it gets down below you and
parallel to the bank let it hang for a bit – still bouncing the tip- and do
that three or four times before you lengthen your cast.
When
you lengthen your cast only add about 3-feet of fly line and repeat the
process until you reach the limit of your gear. Don’t hurry – this is
spring fishing and fish are just starting to feed regularly after a long
winter. Give them a chance to remember how good a baitfish dinner is.
This is one
of my favorite rites of spring. It gets me out of the house for some fresh
air and requires a minimum of gear. I don’t bother to wear my vest or
waders. A single box of favorite flies, my “guide lanyard”, high rubber
boots and a little sunshine are all I need. Heck, I'll even give up
the sunshine.
Be sure and visit the
Forum
and share your thoughts on the
topic.
02/16/06
February 11th, FFIM (website Fly Fishing In
Maine) sponsored SuperBoo III and it was grand. What a way to spend a
February day. One of the guys who attended posted that “If I'd done nothing
but cast, I couldn't have cast all the rods I wanted to cast.
If I'd done nothing but talk I couldn't have talked to everyone I should
have.”
and he was right – what a collection of rods and good people. For
more details and information on how it went check out this post on FFIM
http://www.flyfishinginmaine.com/forums/viewtopic.php?topic=8270&forum=1&10
So, I went and I had a good
time casting and talking and while doing the casting I noticed that, on at
least one occasion, when I aimed at a hoop out there on the floor I hit the
hoop (happily) and I also hit the gym floor with the rod tip (unhappily). I
made a little adjustment and cast the rest of the morning without doing any
damage to any of the rods I cast but hitting the tip on the floor got me
thinking about the casting stroke and follow through after the stroke.
The casting stroke ends with an
actual stop of the rod and if the tip is moving forward when you stop the
stroke the line will continue on and present the fly. If the tip is moving
down when the stroke stops the line will pile somewhere in front of but
close to the caster. And, if the tip is moving up when the stroke stops the
line will continue on gaining height and straightening until the energy is
spent and the line falls completely at the mercy of the wind as to where it
actually lands. That is just the way it is – Lefty Kreh is right when he
says the line will continue in the direction of rod tip travel after you
stop the casting stroke. But what happens after that?
For me what happens after the
stop of the casting stroke is follow through or drift. When the tip stops
and the line starts rolling forward in a hopefully controlled loop my rod
begins to drift slowly down to the water. Often ending its drift with the
rod tip just touching the water or the gym floor, as was the case on the 11th.
There are reasons for this
drift and the main one is that with my rod tip low like that I have a good
straight-line connection to my fly with little too no slack hanging from my
rod tip. If I had left my rod tip up where it was when I stopped my casting
stroke I would have a lot of line hanging straight down from my rod tip to
the water and all that hanging line would be slack that would slow my
strike if I got the hit I was hoping for when my fly landed. But with my
rod tip low to the water and no slack I can quickly set the hook if I get
the hoped for strike. It gives me an edge and I firmly believe that having
the rod tip low like that will improve anyone’s hookup rate.
Another advantage to the low
rod tip is line pick-up. When I want to cast again starting the pick-up
with my rod tip low gives me a much longer pick-up stroke. If I were to
leave my rod tip high after the cast and decided to pick-up my line for a
backcast I just wouldn’t have enough stroke without breaking my wrist on the
backstroke driving my line into the water behind me. Think of it like this,
if my rod is horizontal to the water when I start my pick-up stroke and I
want to stop my pick-up stroke with the rod pointing straight up I only have
90 degrees of stroke available to me. However, if my rod tip is down to
water level when I start the pick-up stroke I’ve got another 45 degrees of
stroke available to me. The rod tip being low is what gives me that extra
stroke length and that extra stroke length allows for a smoother pick-up and
a higher backcast, maybe a high enough backcast to avoid those alder on the
bank that are trying to catch my fly.
So if you don’t drift your rod
tip low to the water after your casting stroke try it the next time you get
our on the water. You may be pleasantly surprised at the advantages that
low rod tip gives you. However, you might not want to drift the tip all the
way down when you are casting someone else’s bamboo rod in a gym.
Be sure and visit the
Forum
and share your thoughts on the
topic.
01/12/06
Sorry I missed last week. And I'll be missing the next two weeks as I will
be on vacation. However, to keep you busy I've typed in a long section
from the book "Trending Into Maine" by Kenneth Roberts. The book was
published in 1938 and this section is taken from a chapter titled "Idle
Remarks on Fishing." - I hope you enjoy it.
"Trout, in southern Maine, are
pitiful little creatures, harried and hunted by careless boys who drive old
Ford automobiles along wood roads with the doltish recklessness of cretins,
and seem to possess all the sporting instincts of gunmen.
When we want trout, we have to
go north, always from the billboards, overnight camps and roadside diners
that have done so much to make Maine hideous.
We go, say, to Aroostook
County, where the unspoiled lakes, ponds, streams and brooks from which
full-grown trout, bass, pickerel and salmon may still be taken are
unbelievably numerous. Thanks to Mr. Wingate Cram, president of the Bangor
and Aroostook Railroad, himself an ardent fisherman, I am able to attach a
partial list of the fishing camps and waters that lie north of Bangor,
within the incomparably beautiful region whose center is Mount Katahdin.
It’s a long list, and to some it may seem dull; but I shall risk its
dullness in the hope that it may be of benefit to those who know only the
portions of Maine that have been half-wrecked by civilization. And I think
it shows, as almost nothing else can, the vast extent of the sportsman’s
paradise that crowns the state.
South Lagrange, thirty-one
miles from Bangor, is headquarters for Birch Stream, Dead Stream and
Ten-Mile Brook, all trout streams.
Lagrange, thirty-five miles
from Bangor, is headquarters for Coldbrook Stream and Hemlock Brook.
South Sebec, forty-nine miles
from Bangor, is headquarters for those who wish to fish Sebec Lake for
pickerel, bass and salmon.
Dover-Foxcroft is fifty-six
miles form Bangor. Within fifteen miles are Bear Pond for white perch,
Bennett Ponds for black bass and pickerel, Peenuguma Pond for smallmouth
bass; Sebec Lake for perch, pickerel, and salmon; Benson Ponds, Burdin Pond,
Buttermilk Pond, Crooked Pond, Forth Pond, Greenwood Ponds, Little
Grindstone Pond, Millbrook Pond and Millbrook Stream for trout and togue.
From Guilford, sixty-four miles
from Bangor, fishermen can reach Foss Pond, Sebec Lake and Sylvan Lake for
trout and salmon; Lake Mahannock, Punch Bowl and Piper Pond for trout.
From Abbot Village, sixty-seven
miles from Bangor, fishermen make excursions to Bear Brook, Foss Pond, Piper
Pond, Thorne Brook and Sylvan Lake for trout, togue and occasional salmon.
Monson, seventy-six miles from
Bangor, is the center for those who wish to reach such excellent trout
waters as Bear Pond, Bell Pond, Doughtery Ponds, Eighteen Pond, hedgehog and
Brown Ponds, Lake Hebron, Long Pond, Meadow Pond, Monson Pond, North Pond,
Onawa Lake, South Pond, and Two Greenwood.
Blanchard is seventy-five miles
from Bangor. The trout waters near it are Bald Mountain Stream, Blackstone
Brook , Bog Stream, Bunker Pond, Crocker Pond, Douty Pond, Lake Hebron, Lily Pond, Marble
Pond, Mud Pond, Ordway Pond, Piscataquis River, Spectacle Pond and
Thanksgiving Pond.
At Shirley, eighty-five miles
from Bangor, fishermen can stay in the Buckhorn Camps and take trout from
Gold Brook, Gravel Brook, Indian Pond, Main Stream, Moxie Pond, Notch Pond,
Oakes Bog, Ordway Pond, Round Pond, Spectacle Pond, Trout Pond and West Bog.
Greenville, ninety-one miles
from Bangor, is headquarters for those who wish to visit the innumerable
ponds, streams and brooks that feed beautiful Moosehead Lake. The camps and
hotels near Greenville are the Mound Kineo House, Harford’s Point Camps,
Moosehead Lake Highlands, Wilson’s, Piscataquis Exchange, Spencer Bay Camp,
Squaw Mountain Inn, Thorofare Camps, West Outlet Camps, Lily Bay House,
Nelson Camp, The Birches, Seboomook House, Tomhegan Camps, and Camp Caribou
– all of which are for those who wish to specialize on Moosehead Land and
its immediate neighborhood. Camps for outlying waters are Camp Chesuncook,
West Branch Pond Camps, Little Lyford Pond Camps, Big Lyford Pond Camps,
Maynard’s Camps, Rainbow Lake Sporting Camps, Yoke Pond Camps, Henderson’s
Camp, Camp Phoenix, Kidney Pond Camps, Kokad-jo Inn and Sporting Camps, and
Wilson Pond Camps.
The principal waters to be
reached from the Greenville section are: Attean Lake, Benson Pond, Big
Lyford Pond, Big Squaw Pond, Burnham Pond, Chesuncook Lake, Crocker Lake,
Daisy Pond, Fitzgerald Pond, Heald Pond, Horseshoe Pond, Indian Pond, Lake
Onawa, Lake Parlin, Little Lyford Pond, Lower Wilson Pond; Moosehead Lake,
Moose River, Mountain Pond, Prong Pond, Rainbow Lake, Roach Pond, Rum
Mountain Pond, Spencer Pond, Squaw Bay, Squaw Mountain Pond, Upper Wilson
Pond, West Branch Pond, Wilson Stream, Wood Pond, Yoke Pond, Sourdnahunk
Lake and Kidney Pond.
Milo, forty-four miles form
Bangor, is headquarters for Alden Brook, Sebec River and Schoodic Lake.
Brownville Junction is the town
from which fishermen set out for beautiful Lake Onawa.
Near Katahdin Iron Works,
sixty-two miles from Bangor, are Big Houston Camps, Big Lyford Pond Camps and
Yoke Pond Camps. Other adjacent waters are Big Houston Pond, Big Lyford
Pond, B Pond, Dam Pond, East Chairback Pond, Horseshoe Pone, Indian Pond,
Little Houston Pond, Long Pond, Lost Pond, Middle Branch Brook, Mountain
Brook Pond, Pleasant River, Silver Lake, Spruce Mountain Pond, Spruce Pond,
West Brach Pond, West Chairback Pond, White Brook and Yoke Pond.
Schoodic, fifty-nine miles from
Bangor, is headquarters for Cedar Pond, Jo Mary Lakes and Schoodic Lake.
Packards, sixty-three miles
from Bangor, is headquarters for Cedar Pond, Northwest Pond, Seboois Lake
Pleasant River, and Bear Brook.
West Seboois, sixty-eight miles
from Bangor, is headquarters for Bear Brook, Patrick Brook, Ragged Mountain
Pond & Stream, Seboois Lake, Seboois Stream, and Upper Jo Mary.
From Ingalls, seventy-one miles
from Bangor, fishermen can reach Cedar Pond, Cedar Lake, Trout Pond and
Flatiron.
Norcross, seventy-six miles
form Bangor, rivals Greenville as a fishing and hunting center; and from
Norcross one has access to the beautiful lakes just south of Mount
Katahdin. The camps in the Norcross section are Buckhorn Camps, Cypher’s
Camp, Given’s Camps, Kidney Pond Camps, McDougall’s Camps, Norcross House,
Pleasant Point Camps, The Antlers Camps and Whitehouse Camps. The waters
reached from them (in most cases by steamer) are: Abol Lake, Ambajejus Lake,
Ambajenackomus Lake, Beaver Pond, Daisy Pond, 1st, 2nd,
3rd, 4th, and 5th Debsconeag Lake, Foss and
Knowlton, Hurd Pond, Lower, Middle and Upper Jo Mary Lake, Katahdin Stream,
Kidney Pond, Millinocket Lake, Minster Pond, Nahmakanta Lake, North Twin
Lake, Passamagamoc Lake, Pemadumcook Lake, Penobscot River Pollywog Lake,
Rainbow Lake, Sourdnahunk Lake, Sourdnahunk Stream and South Twin Lake.
Millinocket, eighty-two miles
from Bangor, is the center for approximately the same waters – Ambajejus
Lake, Daisy Pond, Katahdin Lake, Kidney Pond, Millinocket Lake, Millinocket
Stream, Nollesemic Lake, Pemadumcook Lake, Penobscot River, Schoodic Brook,
Smith Brook, Sourdnahunk Lake and Togue Pond.
From Grindstone, ninety-one
miles from Bangor, fishermen reach Lunksoos Pond, Meadow Brook, Messer Pond,
Penobscot River, Round Pond, Salmon Stream Pond, Sand Bank Brook, Schoodic
Brook, Soldier Pond and Wassataquoik Stream.
Stacyville, one hundred and two
miles from Bangor, is the jumping-off place for Davidson Pond, Katahdin
Lake, Kellogg Pond, Lunksoos Pond, Messer Pond, Moose Pond, Penobscot River,
Salmon Stream Lake, Sand Bank Brook, Six Ponds, Spring Brook Pond,
Wassataquoik Stream and Wassataquoik Lake.
Sherman is one hundred and two
miles from Bangor, and is headquarters for those wishing to fish Bowlin
Pond, Macwahoc Lake, Molunkus Stream, East Branch (of the Penobscot), Salmon
Pond, Salmon Stream, Salmon Stream Lake and Wassataquoik Lake.
Patten, one hundred and
thirteen miles from Bangor, ranks with Greenville and Norcross as one of
northern Maine’s great game centers. The camps near Patten are Point of
Pine Camps, Camp Fairview, Crommet House Bear Mountain and Pleasant Lake
Camps, Hamm House, Jerry Pond Camps, McDonald’s Camps, Foster’s Wilderness
Camps, Scraggly Lake Sporting Camps, Shinn Pond House, Myrick’s Camps,
Peavey Inn, Kilgore’s Camps, Umcolcus Lake Camps and McKenney’s Camps.
Patten is the center for
Bowlin Pond, Crystal Lake, lake Wapiti, Fish Stream, Fowler Ponds, Grand
Lake-Seboois, Green Pond, Hay Brook, Hay Lake, Hale Pond, Jerry Pond, Lower
Shinn Pond, Matagamon Lake, Sawtell Brook Scraggly Lake, Seboois Stream,
Second Lake, Snowshoe Lake, Trout Brook, Upper Shinn Pond, White Horse Lake
and Umcolcus Lake.
Island Falls, one hundred and
seventeen miles from Bangor, is perched on the beautiful ridge that looks
across to Mount Katahdin and the Traveller Mountains – a vista as
magnificent as it is restful. From Island Falls fishermen go to Caribou
Lake, Cole Brook, Dyer Brook, East Branch, Fish Stream, Mattawamkeag Lake
and River, Otter Lake, Sly Brook, Pleasant Lake and Warren Falls.
From Oakfield and Smyrna Mills,
one hundred and twenty-six miles from Bangor, one reaches Dudley Brook,
Green Lake, hale Pond, Hastings Brook, Mattawamkeag River, Mud Lake,
Pleasant Lake, Pleasant Pond, Rockabema Lake, Spaulding Lake, Umcolcus Lake
and Timoney Lake.
At Howe Brook, one hundred and
forty-two miles from Bangor, the fishing waters are Beaver Brook, Cut Pond,
St. Croix Lake, St. Croix River and Tracey Brook.
From Masardis, one hundred and
fifty-nine miles from Bangor, the objectives of trout fishermen are
Aroostook River, Beaver Pond, Brown Brook Pond, Chandler Brook, Clear Lake,
Long Lake, Millimegassett lake, Millnockett Lakes, Mooseleuk Stream, Moose
Pond, Munsungan lakes, Reed Pond, St. Croix River and Umcolcus Stream.
Ashland, one hundred and
sixty-nine miles from Bangor, is headquarters for Clayton Lake, Machais Lake
and Stream, McNally Pond, Pratt Pond, Round Mountain Pond, Rowe Lake,
Musquocook Lakes, Spectacle Lake and Mule Pond.
Portage, one hundred and
eighty-one miles from Bangor, is headquarters for Fish Lake, Portage Lake,
Carry Pond, Chase Lake and Island Pond.
Winterville is one hundred and
ninety-eight miles from Bangor. From Winterville sportsmen take their tents
and packs to the chain of fourteen Red River Lakes, let their beards grow,
and eat trout until they almost burst.
From Eagle Lake, two hundred
and four miles from Bangor, one reaches Square Lake; from Wallagrass, two
hundred and nine miles from Bangor, Blake Lake, Eagle Lake and Wallagrass
Lakes; from Soldier Pond, two hundred and thirteen miles from Bangor, Round
Pond, Sly Brook, and Third lake; from Fort Kent, two hundred and twenty-one
miles from Bangor, Fish River, Five Finger Brook, Glazier Lake, N.B., Baker
Lake, N.B., Umsaskis Lake and St. John River.
St. John, two hundred and
thirty-four miles from Bangor, is the headquarters for Black Lake, Blue
River, Bow Lake, Cross Lake, Gilbert Lake, Glazier Lake, Hanowell Lake,
Plourde Brook, St. John River, Santimos Lake, Savage Lake and Sinclair
Brook.
St. Francis, two hundred and
thirty-nine miles from Bangor, is the point from which sportsmen go to
Allagash River, Big Rapids (St. John), Five Finger Brook, Glazier Lake,
Little Black River, St. Francis River and Umsaskis Lake.
Ludlow is headquarters for
Barker Lake, Cochrane Lake and Country Road Lake; New Limerick for Drew’s
lake, Green Lake and Nickerson Lake; Houlton for Drew’s Lake, Meduxnekeag
Lake and Nickerson Lake; Littleton for Cary Lake, Big Brook, Leary Brook,
Logan Lake and Ross Lake; Monticello for Conroy Lake, Meduxnekeag Lake, No.
9 Lake and White Brook; Robinson for Burnt Land Stream, Mill Pond, No. 9
Lake, Prestile Stream, Three Brooks and Young Brook; Mars Hill for Presque
Isle Deadwater, Presque Isle Stream and Young Lake; Westfield for Clark
Brook, Prestile Stream and Young Brooks; Phair for Prestile Stream and
Spragueville Lake.
From Fort Fairfield, at the
northern tip of Maine, one reaches Aroostook Falls, Brown’s Pond, Gannett
Pond, Gillespie Lake and Tomlinson Pond, as well as the celebrated Tobique
River in Canada. Near by are the Swedish Settlements of New Sweden, Jemtland
and Stockholm, headquarters for Big Armstrong, Carry Brook, Cross Lake,
Johnson Brook, Little Armstrong, McClusky Brook, Madawaska Lake, Madawaska
River, Mud Lake and Square Lake.
If a fisherman were so diligent
as to visit all the streams, ponds and lakes here given, he would have done
no more than scratch the surface of Maine’s potentialities as a haven for
sportsmen – which goes to prove what was hinted at the beginning of this
book: that Maine is too big a state to learn more than a little about in one
short lifetime."
Now - get your map books out
and wile away the winter planning trips to some of these waters - that's my
plan.
Be sure and visit the
Forum
and share your thoughts on the
topic.
12/29/05
How much gear is too much gear? Anyone who has ever fished with me knows I
don’t think you can have too much gear. I carry half the store in my vest
and have extra rods and two gear bags in the truck with “things I might
need” like extra clothes, rain gear, spare reels and spools, wader patch
kits, extra wading staff, backup waders, first-aid kit, thousands of flies,
snacks, tying kit, spare compass, extra gink, split-shot, leader tying kit,
knife, candy, rod repair kit, knot book and lots more. Yep, I don’t think
you can have too much gear, but many people do.
I often get
asked what do I need to have – what’s the minimum I can get by with to fly
fish. The easy answer is rod, reel, line, leader and a fly but that’s not
very practical. It’s nice for you to have something to cut a tippet with
(besides your teeth) and nice for the fish if you have something to remove
hooks with. That adds a nipper and a pair of forceps to the list.
Forceps are
pretty easy to keep hold of. They are either clamped to your shirt or vest
or intertwined in your fingers so that don’t often get dropped. But nippers
are a different animal than forceps – nippers seem to crawl up out of
pockets and jump into the water all on their own. So I like to recommend a
zinger to anyone who is buying a pair of nippers. That’s it, for me that’s
the minimum.
One fly, my
rod, reel, line, leader, nippers with a zinger and a pair of forceps are all
I need. That’s my short list and then I suggest people build up from there
to whatever they are comfortable carrying. My first suggestion for an
addition to the above gear is a fly box, with some flies of course. That
can be an Altoids Tin to a snap locking C&F fly box but a box of some sort
to carry flies in. Then, since I like to fish dry flies that float, I add
some floatant (Gink is my favorite) along with some of the appropriate
tippet for my leader. Speaking of leaders if I’m in my minimal mode give me
4X leader and tippet.
Pockets will
do to carry anything I’ve listed so far and so no vest or chest packs are
needed; nope, nothing else – no waders, no boots, no rain gear. No
first-aid kit, no compass, no split-shot – nothing else is needed. Now I
wouldn’t be comfortable going on stream or river with so little gear but in
my opinion it is all you need. In fact, for a long time it was all I
carried.
Then I got
waders and boots. Then a vest and if there is empty space well you just
have to fill it with something and I did. When my vest was full I got a
gear bag and carried “extra” stuff in it. Yep, went right from one extreme
to the other. For awhile that was OK but I began to have a hard time
keeping track of all my gear and decided to cut back. I got rid of my vest
and gear bag and got a chest pack. If I couldn’t carry it in my chest pack
and wader pocket it didn’t go. That lasted about two seasons – I confess
I’m a gear hound.
I have
convinced myself I need all that stuff I listed at the beginning of this and
I carry it around with me on almost every fishing trip. I don’t have to
have it and can get by without it but not as well as I can if I have it with
me. So I carry it all, enjoy it all and use it all. There is the one test
a piece of gear must pass to stay in my gear bag. I have to use it. At the
end of each season I empty my vest and gear bags. If something is low (like
Gink) I replace it – if something went the season unused I remove it. The
only things that are exempt from this test are my wader patch and first-aid
kits. I'd just as soon not have to use either of those.
Be sure and visit the
Forum
and share your thoughts on the
topic.
12/22/05 - Merry Christmas and
a Happy New Year to you and yours.
Planning a trip south this
winter? Florida, Belize, Bahamas calling to you – well, pack up and go –
bring a golf bag full of fly rods and I’ll be your flats caddy. That is if
you’ll buy my plane ticket and pay my lodge fee. If not well you’re on your
own – no caddy work from me.
Maybe you don’t need a
caddy – you can get by with just one rod. When planning my first trip to
Belize I decided on several rods. I had two 9-weights, 7-weight, and a
6-weight and I checked them all. None of them got there and I fished the
whole week with a Powell 9-weight that the lodge loaned me. With that
9-weigh I was a little over gunned for the bones in Belize, just fine for
permit and a little light for the one tarpon I hooked up with.
So you don’t need a whole bevy
of rods should you go but if I were going tomorrow I’d sure take more than
one rod. I’d also take 4-piece rods so I didn’t have to check them or if I
checked my 4-piece rods they would be packed away in my suitcases not
checked in rod tubes. Rod tubes should be painted red and have white
letters on them that read – STEAL ME – because the theft of rod tubes is
common. I don’t worry as much about checking rods on domestic flights but if
I were leaving the USA I’d rather not check my rods.
My number one consideration for
flats fly rods isn’t the size of the fly or the fish – it’s the wind. Flats
are windy – count on it. Oh, one can hide out in the lee of an island or
find a small sheltered bay to get out of the wind by there’s no guarantee
the fish will be there. Just like fresh water fishing the trick on the
flats is finding fish and if the winds are blowing strong where you find
them, well, you just have to deal with the wind.
With the wind in mind make my
lightest rod a 7-weight and give me a size two Crazy Charlie to cast. I’d
be happy but I’d be even happier with an 8-weight. That would take care of
the Bonefish for me. Permit are another story. Permit can be caught and
played in with an 8-weight but if I had by trusty rod caddy carrying my rod
bag I’d probably ask him for a 9-weight.
Part of my reason for stepping
up to a 9-weight for permit is distance and distance in the wind may well
call for a heavier rod. Bonefish are spooky permit are something worse.
People often spook permit while trying to get into range. Permit are also
more powerful than bones and unless you have unlimited backing you may find
you need the added backbone of a 9-weight rod to slow and tire them.
That same 9-weight will do fine
for tarpon, but I’d rather have a 10-weigh. If your quarry is some of the
back country, mangrove hugging “tar-babies” in the 20lb to 30lb range, maybe
you could drop back down the 8-weight but those deeper water “big boys” the
70lb plus fish will make you cry if you hook into them with and 8-weight.
Those 70lb to 100lb fish will beat you up if you don’t have a rod with a
tremendous amount of butt strength and lifting power. As a matter of fact,
if I’ve got a rod caddy lugging everything give me a 12-weight – just don’t
make me cast it all day long.
Yep, if the southern waters are
in your plans for this winter you can get by with a 9-weight. Notice I said
“A” 9-weight, but I’d never go with just one rod. If I were taking two, as
my back up I’d give serious thought to another 9-weight – another whole
outfit rod, reel, line and backing. That may sound crazy but if you broke
your primary rod you’d still have a rod for most situations you’d find
yourself fishing.
If I were taking three fly
rods I’d take an 8-weight, 9-weight and a 10-weight. That would be sweet.
And if I were taking a golf bag full of fly rods and a caddy to tend my gear
I’d slip in a 6-weigh, 7-weight and a 12-weight. Man, talk about having the
bases covered. Yea, that works for me.
Be sure and visit the
Forum
and share your thoughts on the
topic.
12/15/05
Well, last Thursday’s Review generated a lot of responses on the Forum so I
thought I’d build on last week’s theme of fly line selection. My two
primary lines are a floating and a sink tip line, with a short sinking
section (4-6 feet). Most everyone agreed that a second line was a good
thing and that we are lucky to be fishing now because of the great lines
available to us compared to just relatively short time ago.
There were a
number of lines other than my selection of a sink tip for a second line.
Intermediates, Full Sink, Looped Sink Tips and Shooting Heads were all
mentioned. All are good lines and meet a particular purpose.
All of those
line types are in my gear bag by the way. That’s one of the benefits of
being a shop owner. As a shop owner one has the built in excuse of “I have
to have a spool with a 350 grain Depth Charge on it so I can become familiar
with the line in case someone asks about it.” Then comes “I have to have a
spool with an Intermediate line on it so I can become familiar with the line
in case someone asks about it.” And then……..
Anyway, back
to line selection. One thing that became clear after reading last week’s
follow-up posts was that selection of a second line depends a lot on what
type of fishing you do. I primarily wade rivers and am partial to moving
water and that pushes me to a short sink tip line for two reasons – depth
and mending.
When wading
rivers depth is a factor but not a great one. Except for the deep slow
runs, as a wader, you aren’t normally looking to get real deep. A floating
line with added weight on the leader is normally fine for water 3 to 5 feet
deep. A 350-grain Depth Charge would be overkill and keep you hung on bottom
most of the day. So for those deep runs switching to a sink tip gives me
that additional extra sink I need without the hang-up problem.
Mending is a
problem with full sinking lines. Actually mending is more than a problem
with sinking lines it is downright impossible. If one wants to mend a full
sinking line it has to be done in the air by using a reach cast. However,
with a short sink tip mending is almost as easy and effective as with a
floating line and mending is an important presentation tool – at least in
moving water.
And there’s a
water feature that has a big influence when selecting a line – moving water
or still water. Mending is a lot less of a consideration in still water.
Depth often becomes the controlling factor. Bring on the full sink Type IV
and V lines if not the Sinking Shooting Heads. If getting a Dragon Fly
imitation down to the top of the weed beds in 10 – 12 feet of water is your
goal even a 15 foot sink tip is hard pressed to do it effectively, but a
full sink Type IV or V makes easy work of it. (remember you don't get into a
Type IV or V sink rate until you get into the six and seven weight fly
lines)
And then
there’s the salt. Salt water with its density makes things more buoyant and
that includes your fly line. Buoyancy along with swells combine as good
arguments for doing away with the normal selection of a floating line for
your primary line.
Many feel
that your primary line for salt should be an Intermediate Line and your
secondary line should be a Depth Charge. I’m hard pressed to argue with
them. Swells impart unwanted motion and slack as you present your fly if
your fly line rides high on the surface. Intermediates will lessen the
influence of the swells yet let you fish a popper effectively. Depth Charge
lines will get you down to the depths you want despite tidal influence and
buoyancy.
So what’s the
point of all this? I guess the point is that my question of – Do you need
any line other than your floating line? - should have been – How many lines
other than your floating line do you need? And the answer to that is – It
depends on how many types of water you fish.
Be sure and visit the
Forum
and share your thoughts on the
topic.
12/08/05
Do you need any line other than your floating line? Many say no. I often
ponder that question and my answer is both yes and no.
Yes, because if you fish ponds
and want to work some of the deeper ridges or weed beds a sinking line may
well be the best (read that quickest) way to get down to the fish. Or if
you fish moving water and the flows are fast a sink tip may well be the best
(read that quickest) way to get down to the fish.
No, because if you fish ponds
and want to work some of the deeper ridges or weed beds a floating line with
a long leader, added weight and PATIENCE will get down to the fish. Or if
you fish moving water and the flow is fast a floating line with a long
leader, added weight and PATIENCE will get down to the fish.
Patience is the primary key to
working many situations with a floating line. How much time? How much
patience? What decides? The answer to those three questions is determined
by weight.
How much time you need to allow
is determined by the amount of weight you add. However, there are practical
limitations to how much weight you can add. Two pounds of lead would get
your fly down in a hurry but you might have trouble with your backcast.
When you reach the weight limit of your rod - time - is the only thing you
can add to go deeper.
Unfortunately time is often at
a premium when I’m fishing. I wish it weren’t so but I can’t change that
fact so I work around it. Time is why I have a second fly line – a sinking
line to go along with my floating line. Actually a sinking tip fly line. It
saves me a lot of waiting and keeps me working my flies at the depths I
want.
My reasoning is, if the limit
of what I can comfortably cast for added weight is three split shot and I
add them to a sinking line the whole rig will reach my desired depth quicker
than three split shot added to a floating line.
To meet accepted standards a
5-weight fly line must weigh 140 grains. That standard applies to both
floating and sinking lines. Add three split shot to the floating set up and
those split shot have to offset the floating line's buoyancy. Add three
split shot to a fast sinking tip and those three split shot have to have
nothing to slow their sink rate as the line is sinking as fast as they are.
Yet three split shot added to either line weighs the same – 140 grains plus
three split shot. So if you can cast a floating line with three added split
shot you can casting a sinking tip with three added split shot.
That’s why my answer to “Do I
need any other line than my floating line?” is both yes and no. The answer
is no if you have both time and patience. The answer is yes if you’re
lacking either time or patience.
Be sure and visit the
Forum
and share your thoughts on the
topic.
12/01/05
Well, welcome back to the Thursday Review to some of you and welcome to
those who are visiting for the first time. The
Thursday Review is a sister
project to the Friday
Update I post through the summer. The
Friday Update
focuses on river and fishing conditions with a highlight on the Shawmut
section of the Kennebec River. But when the fishing slows and the ice
forms I switch to this format and use it to reflect on and review the past
season and general fly fishing and fly tying subjects. That opens the doors
to a lot of varied topics and I hope you visit, read and enjoy some of them.
Something all
of New England got an education on this season is fishing in high water.
When asked to sum up this season I say, “it wasn’t bad considering we lost
May, June, October and November to high water.” As I type this I realize
I’ve fibbed to everyone I’ve said that to. I should have said we lost
those months to FLOOD waters.
So I’m going
to list some of the things I did to get some safe fishing in this season and
invite those of you reading this to add something to the
Forum
topic I’m going to start on our shop
Forum.
Click here to view the
Forum
and be sure and register so you can add to the
post.
Fish the
edges – that’s one tactic I used a lot this season. I’d go to my normal
runs and find I couldn’t even get three feet from the bank without the river
threatening to sweep me away. So I’d look for a sun warmed rock and sit for
a while watching the river flow. After a bit I’d notice a seam and eddy
that didn’t exist at normal levels – actually the area the eddy was in often
was high and dry at normal levels. But there it would be, a point of rock
causing the current to swerve and creating a seam with enough depth to offer
shelter from above and a feeding lane. Certainly not a normal lie for a
trout since the bottom was often covered with grass (not aquatic grass) or
ferns but a lie none the less – a prime lie at that providing shelter from
the current, protection from predators and a source of food.
Ponds – yep,
even for guys who, like myself, love that moving water ponds offered that
tug on the end of the line we all seek. I said last season I was going to
fish lakes and ponds more. Mother Nature sure provided the push I needed to
get out of the river rut I was in. Ponds produced well this year and the
high water wasn’t much of a problem for pond fisherman. The canoes and
float tubes just didn’t seem to care.
Moving
upriver - was another successful tactic. The Kennebec is about 140 miles
long and we’re only about 45 or 50 miles from the ocean here in Fairfield.
That means we get the water run off from about 90 miles of river valley
coming our way. So upstream I go and I don’t have to go far. About 30
miles puts me above two of the larger tributaries and it is amazing how much
difference those two tributaries make in the river level. As the season
wore in I went higher and higher ending up at the headwaters of the Kennebec
fishing the East Outlet. This moving upstream is effective and,
unfortunately, expensive in both time and money given gas prices this year
but moving up above big tributaries works.
Fish the
tributaries – that tactic also proved effective, especially early season
when the runoff was more than just high it was dirty and dark. Little
feeder streams and even some of the larger tributaries ran surprisingly
clear during the dark water early season. It appeared to me that the fish
didn’t like that dirty water anymore than I did. There were a number of
smaller feeder streams that held fish, lots of fish, during the periods of
high dirty water. Places I wouldn’t normally fish but places I’m glad I
did.
So those are
the main tactics I used for finding fish during our summer of high water.
I’m sure there are more and I’d like to hear about the methods you used to
get some fishing in. Be sure and visit the
Forum
and share some of them.
|